Connect with us

Tech

Silicon Valley “Intolerant” Says Peter Thiel

Published

on

(Via Zerohedge)


Peter Thiel has had it with Silicon Valley.


The popular libertarian billionaire investor is relocating his home and personal investment firms to Los Angeles from San Francisco and scaling back his involvement in the tech industry, the WSJ reported, marking a rupture between Silicon Valley and its most prominent conservative.


According to WSJ sources, Thiel has recently said tech culture has become increasingly intolerant of conservative political views since Mr. Trump’s election, an attitude he has said is intellectually and politically fraught.


As a result, after spending most of the past four decades in the Bay Area, the 50-year-old plans to permanently move into the 7,000-square foot home overlooking the Sunset Strip that he bought six years ago, a person familiar with the matter said. He also will move Thiel Capital and Thiel Foundation, two firms that oversee his investments, into new L.A. headquarters this year, the person said.


Underscoring the growing ideological polarization of the Valley, what prompted Thiel to take the drastic action was his disappointment with “what he sees as the intolerant, left-leaning politics of the San Francisco Bay Area” coupled with increasing pessimism about the prospects for tech businesses amid greater risk of regulation.


Separately, the WSJ said that Thiel also discussed the possibility of resigning from the board of Facebook: “His relationship with the social-networking company—where he has been a director since 2005, the year after its founding—came under strain after a dispute with a fellow director over Mr. Thiel’s support for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, and a related confrontation over boardroom leaks with Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg last summer.”


Still, for now “Thiel feels he can still help the company and is likely to remain on the board at least for now.”


He may have his hands full: according to Mashable, Facebook has seen a decline in traffic in recent weeks along with millions of users leaving its platform, and is “taking rather drastic measures to win them back. Specifically, spamming the hell out of them in a most unfortunate place. ”


Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Military

Lucas Gage Returns to X After Exposing Palestine Atrocities & Ban Over Alleged Harassment

Published

on

In today’s digital age, social media platforms serve as vital tools for raising awareness and advocating for causes. However, they also present challenges such as harassment and censorship. Recently, actor and activist Lucas Gage faced these challenges head-on when his X account was suspended for several months following harassment from certain groups unhappy with his efforts to expose war atrocities in Palestine. Now, after a prolonged absence, Gage has returned to X, ready to resume his important work of shedding light on crucial issues.

Lucas Gage, known for his roles in various television shows and films, has also been vocal about social justice issues, particularly regarding the Palestinian cause. His advocacy drew the ire of individuals and groups who disagreed with his stance. Gage utilized his platform on X to spotlight the human rights violations and war atrocities occurring in Palestine, which led to backlash from some pro-Israeli factions.

The backlash against Gage escalated into harassment, predominantly from individuals identifying themselves as Zionists. He faced a barrage of abusive messages, threats, and attempts to undermine his activism. Despite his efforts to report and block the harassers, the situation persisted, taking a toll on Gage’s mental well-being and sense of safety.

In a controversial decision, X suspended Gage’s account, citing violations of its community guidelines. Many criticized X for what they perceived as a failure to address harassment effectively, especially given the circumstances surrounding Gage’s case. The ban sparked debates about freedom of expression, censorship, and the responsibilities of social media platforms in safeguarding users from harassment and abuse.

After a hiatus spanning several months, Lucas Gage has made his comeback to X. His return has been met with an outpouring of support from fellow activists, fans, and individuals concerned about censorship and human rights. Gage expressed gratitude for the overwhelming solidarity he received during his absence and reiterated his dedication to advocating for justice and raising awareness about the plight of the Palestinian people.

The incident involving Lucas Gage underscores the significance of advocacy and the hurdles activists encounter, especially when addressing contentious issues. It also highlights the complexities of navigating social media platforms where differing viewpoints often clash, sometimes resulting in hostility and censorship.

As Gage resumes his activism on X, it is imperative to continue discussions about online harassment, censorship, and the necessity for improved mechanisms to shield users from abuse. Social media companies must reevaluate their policies and enforcement strategies to ensure that platforms remain spaces for constructive dialogue and activism, rather than avenues for harassment and stifling dissenting voices.

Lucas Gage’s return to X serves as a testament to the resilience of individuals committed to social justice causes despite facing obstacles and adversity. His experience sheds light on broader issues surrounding online harassment and censorship, prompting important conversations about the role of social media platforms in shaping public discourse. As Gage continues his advocacy, his story serves as inspiration for others to speak out against injustice and strive for positive change.

Continue Reading

Politics

AG Paxton vs. Porn Hub: ‘Good Riddance’

Published

on

Title: Safe Haven

In the heart of Texas, amidst the fervor of legislative changes, a seismic shift rocks the digital landscape. It begins with the click of a button – the withdrawal of Pornhub’s services from the Lone Star State.

As news spreads like rapid gusts across the state, reactions are swift and varied. Some applaud the move, citing the recent law mandating stringent age verification measures for users above 18. Among the chorus of voices is Attorney General Ken Paxton, a staunch advocate for child safety and the architect behind the legislative push.

Paxton, a steadfast figure in Texas politics, doesn’t mince words. “Good riddance,” he declares, his tone resonating with unwavering resolve. For him, it isn’t merely about upholding the law; it’s about safeguarding the innocence of Texas youth.

As the dust settles, Paxton’s efforts garner widespread acclaim. He is hailed as a champion of morality, a beacon in the fight against the proliferation of adult content to minors. His unwavering commitment to protecting children from the perils of online platforms like Pornhub speaks volumes.

But beyond the surface, Paxton’s crusade delves deeper into the murky waters of internet governance. He exposes the inherent contradiction within platforms like Pornhub – professing a commitment to age verification while silently capitalizing on the unchecked access of underage users.

In the wake of Pornhub’s departure, a newfound sense of security permeates the digital realm. Parents breathe easier, knowing that their children are shielded from the explicit content that once lurked just a click away. Paxton’s unwavering stance has ushered in a new era of accountability, one where the well-being of children takes precedence over profit margins.

Yet, amidst the celebrations, a sobering reality lingers. Paxton’s battle is far from over. The war against online exploitation demands constant vigilance, a tireless pursuit of justice in an ever-evolving digital landscape.

As the sun sets over the Texas horizon, Attorney General Ken Paxton remains steadfast in his resolve. With each passing day, he continues to champion the cause of child safety, a beacon of hope in a world fraught with danger. And though the road ahead is fraught with challenges, he marches forward, unwavering in his mission to safeguard the innocence of Texas youth – one victory at a time.

Continue Reading

Media

Twitter Profile With No Tweets Or Followers Suspended

Published

on

New England – A Twitter page for a group called New England Identitarians was temporarily suspended evidently for using the word “Identitarian”. The page had zero followers at the time, and was yet to even make a tweet. In fact, the page was set to private. 

 

Regardless of what you might think of “Identitarian” ideology, most people can agree that the word itself shouldn’t trigger a ban from the public square, which is what social media companies such as Facebook and Twitter are functioning as. The First Amendment was intended to protect the public from government censorship, but in the current day the main medium for public discourse is social media. Practically speaking, there is no difference. It must be lawfully determined if these companies are neutral platforms, or if they function as publishers with editorial judgement. 

 

The same goes for the popular video platform YouTube as well. Formerly known as a free speech medium, it’s now only friendly for what are deemed acceptable opinions. Across all of these sites, “hate speech” is broadly used as an excuse to censor political views that the company doesn’t like, with a strong partisan bias against conservatives. Other free speech friendly social media networks to try are Telegram, Gab, and Parlor. An up-and-coming alternative to YouTube is BitChute.  For livestreaming, there’s D’Live. Perhaps it’s time that we all begin to migrate away from the tyrannical mainstream sites. 

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.